The observed validity of this supports the paraphysical assertion and makes the likelihood of UFO being Earth-created greater than the likelihood of their creation on another planet. Given that real UFO are paraphysical, capable of reflecting light like ghosts and given also that (according to many observers) they remain visible as they change position at ultrahigh speeds from one point to another, it follows that those that remain visible in transition do not dematerialize for that swift transition, and therefore, their mass must be of a diaphanous (very diffuse) nature, and their substance relatively etheric. For, if the materiality of UFO is paraphysical (and consequently normally invisible), UFO could more plausibly be creations of an invisible world coincident with the space of our physical Earth planet than creations in the paraphysical realms of any other physical planet in the solar system. That while it may be that some operators of UFO are normally the paraphysical denizens of a planet other than Earth, there is no logical need for this to be so. On May 3, 1969, he gave a talk on UFOs at Caxton Hall in London, in which he said: Take RAF air marshall Goddard for example: It seems this view has been around longer than the 'modern' ET explenation. A real case of 'you can't handle the truth'. Given that some higher ups in government hold to an interdimensional interpretation (within a religious framework), do you think it's plausible to conclude that the stance is that it's in the best interest of the public not to disclose anything conclusive? This would imply the US goverment is actually doing a service to its citizens. Please report posts/comments which break Reddiquette or our rules.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |